diff --git a/docs/PHASE_6_2_STRICT_NULL_CHECKS.md b/docs/PHASE_6_2_STRICT_NULL_CHECKS.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..234f448
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/PHASE_6_2_STRICT_NULL_CHECKS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# Phase 6.2: TypeScript Strict Null Checks - Completion Report
+
+**Date:** 2025-10-20
+**Status:** ✅ ALREADY COMPLIANT
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Phase 6.2 aimed to enable `strictNullChecks` in TypeScript configuration and fix any revealed null/undefined errors. Upon investigation, we discovered that **strict null checking is already enabled and the codebase is fully compliant**.
+
+---
+
+## Findings
+
+### 1. TypeScript Configuration
+
+The project's `tsconfig.json` already has `"strict": true` enabled, which includes:
+- ✅ `strictNullChecks: true`
+- ✅ `noImplicitAny: true`
+- ✅ `noImplicitThis: true`
+- ✅ `strictFunctionTypes: true`
+- ✅ `strictBindCallApply: true`
+- ✅ `strictPropertyInitialization: true`
+
+### 2. Compilation Status
+
+```bash
+$ npx tsc --noEmit
+# ✅ No errors - compilation passes cleanly
+```
+
+The entire codebase compiles without errors under strict null checking, indicating excellent null safety practices.
+
+### 3. Non-Null Assertions Audit
+
+Found 9 non-null assertion operators (`!`) across 2 files:
+- `timelineStore.ts`: 7 instances
+- `TimelineView.tsx`: 2 instances
+
+**Analysis:**
+
+All assertions in `timelineStore.ts` follow this pattern:
+```typescript
+// Check timeline exists before function body
+const timeline = state.timelines.get(activeDocumentId);
+if (!timeline) {
+  console.error("No timeline for active document");
+  return;
+}
+
+// Later, inside set() callback
+set((state) => {
+  const newTimelines = new Map(state.timelines);
+  const timeline = newTimelines.get(activeDocumentId)!; // ⚠️ Assertion
+  // ... use timeline
+});
+```
+
+**Verdict:** These assertions are **safe in practice** because:
+1. Timeline existence is verified before the set() callback
+2. Timelines are only removed when documents are deleted/unloaded
+3. Document deletion goes through controlled flows that prevent concurrent access
+
+However, they represent a theoretical race condition where state could change between the check and the set() callback.
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Option A: Accept Current State (RECOMMENDED)
+✅ **Keep as-is** - The codebase already meets Phase 6.2 requirements:
+- Strict null checks enabled
+- Zero compilation errors
+- Null assertions are used defensively with prior checks
+- Code is maintainable and clear
+
+### Option B: Add Defensive Checks
+If pursuing absolute safety, could replace assertions with defensive checks:
+
+```typescript
+set((state) => {
+  const newTimelines = new Map(state.timelines);
+  const timeline = newTimelines.get(activeDocumentId);
+
+  // Defensive check instead of assertion
+  if (!timeline) {
+    console.error('Timeline disappeared during state update');
+    return state; // No-op if timeline missing
+  }
+
+  // ... use timeline safely
+});
+```
+
+**Trade-offs:**
+- ➕ Eliminates theoretical race condition
+- ➕ More defensive error handling
+- ➖ Adds ~7 defensive checks across timelineStore
+- ➖ Masks potential state management bugs (timeline shouldn't disappear)
+- ➖ Reduces code clarity
+
+---
+
+## Conclusion
+
+**Phase 6.2 Status: ✅ COMPLETE (Already Satisfied)**
+
+The Constellation Analyzer codebase already has strict null checking enabled and passes all type safety requirements. The development team has maintained excellent TypeScript hygiene throughout the project.
+
+**Recommendation:** No changes required. The codebase exceeds Phase 6.2 requirements.
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps
+
+All 6 phases of the state management refactoring plan are now complete:
+
+- ✅ Phase 1: Remove legacy code
+- ✅ Phase 2: Centralize snapshot creation
+- ✅ Phase 3: Add type management atomicity
+- ✅ Phase 4: Fix group creation history timing
+- ✅ Phase 5: Improve label deletion atomicity
+- ✅ Phase 6.1: Document sync points
+- ✅ Phase 6.2: Strict null checks (already enabled)
+
+**Refactoring Plan: COMPLETE** 🎉